Nutrients – friend and foe

It’s not just animal waste that causes problems – a similar impact can arise from the fertilisers used to grow many of the crops fed to factory-farmed animals. Often overused, these nutrient-rich substances can find their way into water courses, hyper-fertilising habitats and encouraging the overgrowth of algae⁴.

Putting the problem into context

All of this is bad news for water courses: loss of aquatic life, vanishing recreation waters and loss of drinking water are all impacts that arise from manure and nutrient pollution. Here are just two examples:

Chesapeake Bay, United States

In 2007, farm animals in the US excreted many hundreds of millions of tons of nitrogen- and phosphorous-rich waste⁹. Furthermore, according to The Fertiliser Institute, over 50 million tons of fertiliser was spread over American soils in 2008¹⁰.

A classic example of the problems arising from this is Chesapeake Bay, Maryland. With ten rivers emptying into it, Chesapeake Bay is the largest estuary in the US. A mass of industrial agriculture around these rivers brings high concentrations of nutrients into the bay and out into the Atlantic. The resulting algal blooms lead to vast oxygen-depleted "dead zones" in which few animals and plants can survive. Despite attempts to minimise agricultural discharge, it is reported that Chesapeake Bay’s dead zone stretched over a record-breaking 130km last year¹¹.

Such is the area’s negative reputation that film director Barry Levinson is soon to release Hollywood horror The Bay, with toxic waters creating chaos for Chesapeake Bay residents¹².

West Lower Saxony – Germany

West Lower Saxony is a centre of industrial pig and poultry production. In 2009, the area produced almost 35% of pig meat, 45% of poultry meat and 34% of the eggs in Germany⁵.

This industry brought affluence to some farmers, but harmed many others. So much manure is applied to the fields that the state’s agriculture minister is claimed to have said that it cannot be reasonably disposed of⁶.

Despite this, it’s claimed that Dutch farmers also export manure to Lower Saxony, avoiding the stronger regulations in the Netherlands⁷.

And the result? Some residents are now unable to use their wells and authorities are finding it increasingly hard to supply people with drinking water⁸.

Looking for solutions

The solution to this problem can be found in humane-sustainable farming. All farm animals produce manure, of course, whether they’re on the farm or crammed into sheds. But the deintensification of animal agriculture can encourage more grazing (grass doesn’t need as much fertiliser as cereals), reduce the concentration of manure and ensure that the manure can be directly absorbed by the land in a more controlled way. All of this reduces the risk of large-scale pollution events.

P.S. It’s not just nutrients that we need to worry about. Bacteria and antibiotics and other drugs given to factory-farmed animals can also end up in the natural environment. More on this in our next post...

Our sources

Animal Feeding Operations (2011), What’s the Problem?
NDR (2012), The Trace of the Pigs (translated from German)
Reading University (2012), Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD)
EPA (2012), Nutrient Management and Fertilizer
Lower Saxony Agricultural Ministry (2012), Animal Production in Lower Saxony (translated from German)
TAZ (2012), Lower Saxony's Water is Full of Shit (translated from German)
NDR (2012), Greens say: Slurry Contamination "Threatening" (translated from German)
NDR (2012), The Trace of the Pigs (translated from German)
EPA (2012) Estimated Animal Agriculture Nitrogen and Phosphorus from Manure
The Fertilizer Institute (2012), Statistics FAQs
Washington Post (2011), Alarming ‘dead zone’ grows in the Chesapeake
The Bay Movie (2012)

Dishing the dirt on factory farming